2016 Lamborghini Aventador LP750-4 Superveloce

2016 Lamborghini Aventador LP750-4 Superveloce
With price from $497,895 what you expect to have best engine, good looking, better features, quiet and fun driving, among these many are missing in Lamborghini Aventador Superveloce as it misses out USB ports, Bluetooth , cruise control, carpet. Cooling fans produces mechanical noises. The Superveloce, is powerful version of old Aventador.

Very fast touches 60 mph within 2.7 seconds, and 10.5 seconds for 135 mph, takes 147 feet to stop from 70 mph. Weight is merely less than SUV, carbon fiber is used for door panels, rear diffuser, seats shells, engine cover, wing.

Powerful V-12 produces 740 horsepower at 8400 rpm and 599 lb-ft of torque at 5500 rpm. Being wide uses 106.3 inch wheelbase, at times shape and overall visibility produces difficulty on road especially in city driving. Lamborghini Aventador Superveloce has moderate weighted steering lacks granular feedback. Seven speed automatic with manual shifting seems old for this price. Switching between two modes Corsa or Sport increases shift speed punches throttle response.

Carbon experience on tunnel, door and floor and interior with some leather along with yellow instrument cluster displays. Carbon shell type seats are low build and do not offer height or seat angle adjustments. Aventador ground clearance is good.

Fast, best brakes provides better grip, though Lamborghini has to make up on price tag to get it going.

Starting Price $497,895
Vehicle Type 2 door coupe, mid engine, 4 wheel drive
Engine DOHC 48-valve V-12, port fuel injection
Transmission 7-speed automated manual, manual shifting mode
Horsepower 740 hp @ 8400 rpm
Torque 509 lb-ft @ 5500 rpm
Displacement 397 cu in
Wheelbase 106.3 in
Length 190.4 in
Width 79.9 in
Height 44.7 in
Curb weight 3868 lb
Passenger volume 50 cu ft
Cargo volume 5 cu ft
0-60 mph 2.7 secs.
0-100 mph 5.9 secs.
Top speed 217 mph
Rolling start (5-60 mph) 3.3 secs.
Braking (70-0 mph) 147 ft
Fuel economy (city/highway) 11/18 mpg
C/D observed 8 mpg
Pros very much stable, four wheel drive
Cons heavy, poor limits